MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093532019 · doi:10.1353/bkb.2020.0040

The Color of Emotions in Isabelle Arsenault's Illustrations

2020· article· en· W3093532019 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Perry Nodelman

Bibliographic record

VenueBookbird/Book bird · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicColor perception and design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)SimplicityLiteral (mathematical logic)PsychologyVisual artsArtAestheticsComputer sciencePhilosophyLinguisticsArtificial intelligenceEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Color of Emotions in Isabelle Arsenault's Illustrations Perry Nodelman (bio) Isabelle Arsenault—born in Sept-Îles, Quebec, in 1978, a graphic design graduate from the Université du Québec à Montréal, and still a resident of that city—has illustrated a wide variety of books for publishers in Canada and, increasingly, elsewhere, in ways that successfully represent their author's diverse intentions but are nevertheless instantly recognizable as hers. Arsenault's images tend to be minimal and mostly monochromatic—simplified but assured outlines of people and their environments. But despite their simplicity, these images convey complex emotions in ways that both express and extend the implications of the texts they accompany. Arsenault is often more interested in depicting the thoughts and emotions of characters than in showing them in the places and situations that engender the emotions—more interested in interior events than in the physical circumstances that lead to them. In her images for Maxine Trottier's Migrant, for instance, she accompanies the minimal details of young Anna's environment as the child of migrant Mennonite farmworkers with literal depictions of how Anna imagines herself and others—as a jackrabbit or as kittens or as themselves floating over the tomatoes they are picking but with the wings of bees. Click for larger view View full resolution In Fanny Britt's Jane, the Fox & Me, similarly, when young Hélène imagines that the bathing suit she is trying on makes her look like a sausage, Arsenault depicts her as an actual sausage in a bathing suit but with human arms and legs, and when Vanessa's sister Virginia wakes up "feeling wolfish" in Kyo Maclear's Virginia Wolf, Arsenault depicts her as an actual wolf in a human bedroom. Then, as Vanessa encourages Virginia to join her in imagining the utopian place she calls Bloomsberry, Virginia's resistance to moving beyond her depression is signaled by her continuing to appear as a wolf-shaped black silhouette—until a final picture in full color reveals that the two points that have been representing her wolf ears have become the edges of the jaunty bow she wears on top of her newly happy human head. This transformation is an example of [End Page 59] the economy of Arsenault's work—the ways in which a few simple brushstrokes can convey not only a change in a character's state of mind but also the nature of that state of mind, the complex thoughts and emotions that it consists of. While most of her images are primarily monochromatic—usually black and/or brown—Arsenault often includes just one or two figures in another color. In her pictures for Jean Pendziwol's Once Upon a Northern Light, for instance, Arsenault not only highlights the aurora borealis with vivid greens and purples in otherwise primarily black-and-white depictions of snowy nights, but she also offers just a few green branches in otherwise black-and-white pine trees and depicts the red cheeks of rabbits and the red fur of a fox emerging from dark shadows. These few colorful details both create a focus for viewers' attention and offer a sense of a lively world obscured by the night but still visible to attentive viewers. More symbolically, paying attention to the presence of yellow and blue objects in Arsenault's otherwise brown and black illustrations for her own text in Collette's Lost Pet, about an imaginative child making friends in Arsenault's own Montreal neighborhood, reveals how Colette's imagination works: it seems to be the things in her environment that contribute to her creation of a blue and yellow parakeet. The "Fragile" label on the box Collette angrily kicks after her mother denies her wish for a pet is the first appearance of yellow in the book after her own yellow coat, thus implying a connection between the girl and fragility, so that her transformation of the drab bird that flies out of the box into an imaginary blue parakeet with a bit of yellow on its neck represents its connection to Colette herself. The yellow spot shares its shape with the yellow-cloaked Colette, the blue its color with...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBookbird/Book birdSame topicColor perception and designFrench-language works237,207