MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093834217 · doi:10.4324/9781003122609-10

Recovering Misdirected Money from Banks: Ministerial Receipt at Law and in Equity

2020· book-chapter· en· W3093834217 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Bryan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal principles and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReceiptEquity (law)BusinessEconomicsFinancial systemLaw and economicsMonetary economicsLawAccountingPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1917 one MS Taylor, a Canadian serving as an officer in the Royal Naval Air Service, provided the necessary authority for his pay of £20 a month to be paid directly into his current account held at the High Holborn branch of the National Provincial Bank. In March 1918 he transferred to the newly formed Royal Air Force and was killed in July 1918. This tale of the death of a pioneer air force pilot followed by bureaucratic muddle contains within its brief compass the issues discussed in this paper, although the judgment touches only lightly upon some of them. Claims against banks in restitution can be brought at common law or in equity. It is sometimes argued that the meaning of receipt in equity differs from its common law signification. A bank acts as its customer’s agent not only in paying out money but also in receiving it and crediting it to the customer’s account.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.013
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLegal principles and applicationsFrench-language works237,207