MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Implementation of Neural Networks for Phaseless Parametric Inversion

2020· article· en· W3094019439 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBinInversion (geology)Artificial neural networkParametric statisticsSynthetic dataAlgorithmComputer scienceInverse transform samplingParametric modelExperimental dataArtificial intelligenceMathematicsGeologyStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a machine learning work flow for the parametric inversion of grain bin measurements in which a neural network is trained solely on synthetic data for a unique bin geometry. This neural network can subsequently be used to rapidly obtain 4 inversion parameters (grain height, cone angle, and bulk real and imaginary permittivity of the grain) from uncalibrated, experimental data. We have previously shown that these 4 parameters can be used to calibrate experimental data and serve as prior information for full-data inversion. Our results show that a densely connected neural network that supports multifrequency data can better predict the cone angle of grain, and perform almost as well on grain height predictions, as the single-frequency simplex inversion method previously described. These findings suggest that neural networks trained on synthetic data may be a useful tool in the inversion of experimental data, providing prior information and a method for calibration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207