MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3095087861 · doi:10.1063/5.0020977

High-speed droplet impingement on dry and wetted substrates

2020· article· en· W3095087861 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersConsortium de Recherche et d’innovation en Aérospatiale au Québec
KeywordsMechanicsCompressibilityPhysicsWork (physics)Aerospace engineeringMechanical engineeringThermodynamicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-speed droplet impact is of great interest to power generation and aerospace industries due to the accrued cost of maintenance in steam and gas turbines. The repetitive impacts of liquid droplets onto rotor blades, at high relative velocities, result in blade erosion, which is known as liquid impingement erosion (LIE). Experimental and analytical studies in this field are limited due to the complexity of the droplet impact at such conditions. Hence, numerical analysis is a very powerful and affordable tool to investigate the LIE phenomenon. In this regard, it is crucial to understand the hydrodynamics of the impact in order to identify the consequent solid response before addressing the LIE problem. The numerical study of the droplet impingement provides the transient pressure history generated in the liquid. Determining the transient behavior of the substrate, in response to the pressure force exerted due to the droplet impact, would facilitate engineering new types of surface coatings that are more resistant to LIE. To that end, quantifying the impact pressure of compressible liquid droplets impinged at very high velocities, up to 500 m/s, on rigid solid substrates and liquid films is the main objective of the present work. A wide range of scenarios that commonly arise in the LIE problem are considered, i.e., droplet sizes between 200 µm and 1000 μm, impact velocities ranging from 100 m/s to 500 m/s, and liquid film thicknesses of 0 µm–200 μm. The maximum pressure exerted on the solid surface due to the droplet impact is calculated for both dry and wetted substrates. The results obtained from compressible fluid modeling are compared to those of other numerical studies and analytical correlations, available in the open literature. New correlations are developed for maximum impact pressure on rigid solids and liquid films that can be used to characterize the solid stress and estimate the lifetime of the material by carrying out the fatigue analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it