Investigating the Plate Kinematics of the Bay of Biscay Using Deformable Plate Tectonic Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The plate kinematics of the Iberian plate and their implications on the plate tectonic evolution of the Bay of Biscay during rifting and subsequent opening of the southern North Atlantic continue to be topics of scientific discussion and debate. Constrained by previous plate reconstruction, geophysical, and geological studies, deformable plate tectonic reconstructions of the Bay of Biscay‐Parentis rift system are created in this study using the GPlates software. These deformable plate models are used to investigate the kinematics of the Landes High, Le Danois High, and Ebro Block previously recognized as independent continental blocks within deformable regions. A comparison between results calculated via deformable plate models with previously published and newly presented gravity inversion crustal thickness estimates provided a good metric for delineating the most probable plate kinematic scenario for the Bay of Biscay‐Parentis system and investigating the effect of the plate kinematic scenarios on the present‐day structure. The preferred plate kinematic model implies a transtensional Bay of Biscay‐Parentis rift system from the Jurassic to Early Cretaceous, with the onset of significant crustal thinning initiating during the Late Jurassic (∼150 Ma) induced by the motion of the Landes High and its interplay with the Ebro Block. Aside from demonstrating the role of the Landes High and its suggested interplay with structural inheritance on the deformation experienced within the Bay of Biscay, the timing and orientation of regional stress directions, and the velocities induced by the preferred deformable model provide good comparisons with previously calculated subsidence rates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".