The Brazilian Adventures of a Blue-Eyed Ojibway: An Interview with Drew Hayden Taylor
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The spread of the Indigenous storytelling gospel has no borders, as Drew Hayden Taylor has shown. The Anishinaabe writer is one of the major names in the history of Indigenous Theatre and Indigenous Literature in Canada, who has contributed to the spread of Indigenous cultures and traditions through many different genres, such as theatre, novel, short stories and films. One might wander if it is the Anishinaabe nomadic tradition or the artistic career, but the fact is that travelling is part of the nature of the “Blue-Eyed Ojibway” that lives both in the Curve Lake Nation and in Toronto, in Ontario, but is also a citizen of the world. However, the great adventurer had never travelled to South America until last year. It was our fortunate meeting in Canada in 2018 that changed the course of this story, which also resulted in an interview published in Interfaces Brasil\Canadá that year, entitled “Indigenous Storytelling in the Contemporary World: An Interview with Drew Hayden Taylor”. One more country was added to the passport of the great traveller, and one more significant bridge between Indigenous knowledges in Brazil and in Canada was promoted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it