Crop pattern planning and irrigation water allocation compatible with climate change using a coupled network flow programming-heuristic optimization model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sustainable agricultural production has encountered difficulties such as water scarcity, improper use of available water resources and climate change in arid countries like Iran. Simulation-optimization approaches are helpful tools for crop pattern planning and irrigation water allocation to ensure maximum net benefit is gained from the system. In this paper, optimum cultivation area and allocation of irrigation water in conditions compatible with climate change are obtained for the Borkhar plain in Iran. To achieve this, the network flow programming-based MODSIM, as a water allocation simulation model, is coupled with the grey wolf optimization (GWO) algorithm to obtain the optimum irrigation amounts and cultivation areas in the plain under two conditions: status quo, and with climate change-affected streamflows. The Hadley Centre coupled Model version 3 (HadCM3) and the second-generation Canadian Earth System Model (CanESM2) are used to generate the climatic parameters in the study area. The Identification of unit Hydrographs and Component flows from Rainfall, Evapotranspiration and Streamflow (IHACRES) rainfall–runoff model is applied to calculate the coefficients of variation for the Zayandehroud River streamflows, as the surface water resource for irrigation of the plain. Results indicate that the agricultural net benefit gained from the plain will decrease by 1.5% in the A2 emissions scenario, and by 3.5%, 8% and 17.5% in the three representative concentration pathway (RCP) scenarios in the optimum states obtained by the GWO-MODSIM model. Moreover, the cultivation areas are decreased in the climate change scenarios. Therefore, appropriate management policies should be adopted for adaptation to the likely future situation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".