Real‐time moving object detection and removal from 3D pointcloud data for humanoid navigation in dense GPS‐denied environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Robot perception in dynamic confined unstructured environments is a challenging task due to unanticipated changes that take place in the surroundings. Although 3D perception sensors are able to capture terrain topology with high precision, the interim variations between collected sensor data that are caused due to the motion of moving entities with respect to the robot lead to noisy mappings of the environment. In this article, a real‐time 3D perception filter is presented that is capable of detecting and eliminating moving point clusters from the input pointcloud data collected in an indoor environment. Using LiDAR and IMU sensors the proposed mechanism can help in precise 3D pointcloud map generation in dynamic and unstructured GPS‐denied environments. In this article, a novel approach has been proposed based on the concepts of data clustering, relative motion, pointcloud change detection and confidence tracking. The novelty of this approach lies in its ability to detect within cluster movements and the proposal of a generic tracking method for handling inconsistent motion of objects typically found in indoor environments. For the detection of moving objects, the proposed mechanism does not require any prior knowledge about the target entity. For pointcloud preprocessing, a ground plane removal approach has been proposed based on voxel grid covariance along the axis normal to the ground. The approach was experimented on a humanoid robot in indoor office environments using Velodyne VLP‐16 LiDAR and Intel T265 IMU. The results show that the proposed approach is efficient in detecting indoor moving objects in real time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".