MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3097072037 · doi:10.1520/mpc20190219

Effect of Rolling after Heat Treatment on Hydrogen Embrittlement Susceptibility for High Strength Steel Fasteners

2020· article· en· W3097072037 on OpenAlexaff
F. Saliby, S. Brahimi, Sriraman K. Rajagopalan, S. Yue

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Performance and Characterization · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityEspace pour la vie
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceHydrogen embrittlementEmbrittlementHigh strength steelMetallurgyHigh heatHydrogenComposite materialCorrosion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Steel fasteners comprising two different metallurgical structures were investigated for hydrogen embrittlement (HE) susceptibility by incremental step load testing. The metallurgical structures examined consisted of tempered martensite obtained by quenching and tempering and lower bainite obtained by austempering. It has been shown that lower bainite exhibits marginally lower HE susceptibility when tested under moderate hydrogen charging conditions (e.g., −1.0 V). At the most severe hydrogen charging potential of −1.2 V, both microstructures are equally embrittled. The current paper examines the effect of the sequence of the fabrication process, specifically the effect of rolling the threads before and after heat treatment (i.e., quenching and tempering or austempering). The results show irrespective of the metallurgical structure, rolling the threads after heat treatment causes a significant decrease in HE susceptibility. These findings are attributed to the presence of high dislocation density when thread rolling is performed on hardened parts as a final manufacturing step.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials Performance and CharacterizationSame topicHydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metalsFrench-language works237,207