Deriving Access Control Models based on Generic and Dynamic Metamodel Architecture: Industrial Use Case
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the rapid propagation of technologies and their heterogenous structure of networks, platforms, applications, devices, etc., controlling access to physical and logical resources becomes a necessary requirement. The existing Access Control (AC) models (also hybrid models) are not sufficient to satisfy the current needs of security requirements with this diversity of technological aspects and computing environments due to fact of being vulnerable to various kinds of attacks and threats. Hence, AC metamodels are proposed to serve as a unifying framework or to work as a general basis to derive multiple AC models as special cases or instances. In the literature, several AC metamodels are presented for various scenarios for centralized (e.g. organizations, industries, …) and decentralized (e.g. cloud computing, internet of things, …) environments to enforce AC policies. Despite some of their advantages, they lack some essential features and have limitations specially with the current technology propagations. In this paper, we propose a dynamic and enhanced architecture for an AC metamodel, and present an industrial use case to explain how this architecture is generic to derive various AC model instances and can be used as a base for any future developments in this domain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it