MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3098440765 · doi:10.1145/3690821

Efficient polynomial-time approximation scheme for the genus of dense graphs

2024· article· en· W3098440765 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the ACM · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenusScheme (mathematics)MathematicsPolynomial-time approximation schemePolynomialTime complexityComputer scienceCombinatoricsBiologyZoologyMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main results of this paper provide an Efficient Polynomial-Time Approximation Scheme (EPTAS) for approximating the genus (and non-orientable genus) of dense graphs. By dense we mean that \(|E(G)|\ge \alpha \, |V(G)|^2\) for some fixed \(\alpha \gt 0\) . While a constant-factor approximation is trivial for this class of graphs, approximations with factor arbitrarily close to 1 need a sophisticated algorithm and complicated mathematical justification. More precisely, we provide an algorithm that for a given (dense) graph G of order n and given \(\varepsilon \gt 0\) , returns an integer g such that G has an embedding in a surface of genus g , and this is ɛ-close to a minimum genus embedding in the sense that the minimum genus \(\mathsf {g}(G)\) of G satisfies: \(\mathsf {g}(G)\le g\le (1+\varepsilon)\mathsf {g}(G)\) . The running time of the algorithm is \(O(f(\varepsilon)\,n^2)\) , where \(f(\cdot)\) is an explicit function. Next, we extend this algorithm to also output an embedding (rotation system) whose genus is g . This second algorithm is an Efficient Polynomial-time Randomized Approximation Scheme (EPRAS) and runs in time \(O(f_1(\varepsilon)\,n^2)\) . Our algorithms are based on the analysis of minimum genus embeddings of quasirandom graphs. We use a general notion of quasirandom graphs [ 25 ]. We start with a regular partition obtained via an algorithmic version of the Szemerédi Regularity Lemma (due to Frieze and Kannan [ 17 ] and to Fox, Lovász, and Zhao [ 14 , 15 ]). We then partition the input graph into a bounded number of quasirandom subgraphs, which are preselected in such a way that they admit embeddings using as many triangles and quadrangles as faces as possible. Here we provide an ɛ-approximation \(\nu (G)\) for the maximum number of edge-disjoint triangles in G . The value \(\nu (G)\) can be computed by solving a linear program whose size is bounded by certain value \(f_2(\varepsilon)\) depending only on ɛ. After solving the linear program, the genus can be approximated (see Corollary 1.7 ). The proof of this result is long and will be of independent interest in topological graph theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.632
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it