MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3098644380

Orbit equivalence rigidity for product actions

2020· article· en· W3098644380 on OpenAlexafffund
Daniel Drimbe

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Operator Algebra Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersPacific Institute for the Mathematical Sciences
KeywordsLambdaProduct (mathematics)Measure (data warehouse)CombinatoricsEquivalence (formal languages)Orbit (dynamics)MathematicsPhysicsDiscrete mathematicsQuantum mechanicsGeometryComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this talk we provide a natural complement to Monod and Shalom's orbit equivalence superrigidity theorem for irreducible actions of product groups by providing a large class of product actions whose orbit equivalence relation remember the product structure. More precisely, we show that if a product $\\Gamma_1\\times\\dots\\times\\Gamma_n \\curvearrowright X_1\\times\\dots\\times X_n$ of measure preserving actions is stably orbit equivalent to a measure preserving action $\\Lambda\\curvearrowright Y$, then $\\Lambda\\curvearrowright Y$ is induced from an action $\\Lambda_0\\curvearrowright Y_0$ and there exists a direct product decomposition $\\Lambda_0=\\Lambda_1\\times\\dots\\times\\Lambda_n$ into $n$ infinite groups. Moreover, there exists a measure preserving action $\\Lambda_i\\curvearrowright Y_i$ that is stably orbit equivalent to $\\Gamma_i\\curvearrowright X_i$, for any $1\\leq i\\leq n$, and the product action $\\Lambda_1\\times\\dots\\times\\Lambda_n\\curvearrowright Y_1\\times\\dots\\times Y_n$ is isomorphic to $\\Lambda_0\\curvearrowright Y_0$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicAdvanced Operator Algebra ResearchFrench-language works237,207