MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3099551741 · doi:10.1002/ett.4168

Mining large‐scale high utility patterns in vehicular ad hoc network environments

2020· article· en· W3099551741 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVehicular ad hoc networkWireless ad hoc networkPruningMobile ad hoc networkSet (abstract data type)Big dataDistributed computingData miningComputer networkWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract One well‐known type of mobile ad hoc network is known as a vehicular ad hoc network (VANET). The functions of such a network are integrated into a new generation of wireless networks for vehicles, which has established a robust self‐organizing network that exists between roadside units and mobile vehicles. In this article, we research the comfort applications in VANET with a new proposed algorithm, EHUM, short form for efficient high utility itemset mining, to mine patterns of the more popular Points of Interest (POIs). This algorithm is based on the traditional high‐utility itemset mining (HUIM) algorithm, and we propose a more reasonable pruning strategy. Concurrently, for solving the problem of excessive data volume in VANET, we applied this algorithm to the MapReduce architecture used for improving the feasibility in practical applications. Our in‐depth work in this article culminates with some experimental results that clearly show that our proposed algorithm can perform well to mine the POIs pattern in a big data data set and shows great performance in a Hadoop computing cluster.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it