Application of nature inspired algorithms for multi-objective inventory control scenarios
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An inventory control system having multiple items in stock is developed in this paper to optimize total cost of inventory and space requirement. Inventory modeling for both the raw material storage and work in process (WIP) is designed considering independent demand rate of items and no volume discount. To make the model environmentally aware, the equivalent carbon emission cost is also incorporated as a cost function in the formulation. The purpose of this study is to minimize the cost of inventories and minimize the storage space needed. The inventory models are shown here as a multi-objective programming problem with a few nonlinear constraints which has been solved by proposing a meta-heuristic algorithm called multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO). A further meta-heuristic algorithm called multi-objective bat algorithm (MOBA) is used to determine the efficacy of the result obtained from MOPSO. Taguchi method is followed to tune necessary response variables and compare both algorithm's output. At the end, several test problems are generated to evaluate the performances of both algorithms in terms of six performance metrics and analyze them statistically and graphically.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it