MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3101030683 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1309.7846

Infinite soliton and kink-soliton trains for nonlinear Schr\\"odinger\n equations

2013· article· en· W3101030683 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Physics Problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsSolitonMathematicsNonlinear systemTrainMathematical proofPoint (geometry)Schrödinger's catMathematical analysisNonlinear Schrödinger equationSchrödinger equationMathematical physicsClassical mechanicsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We look for solutions to generic nonlinear Schr\\"odinger equations build upon\nsolitons and kinks. Solitons are localized solitary waves and kinks are their\nnon localized counter-parts. We prove the existence of infinite soliton trains,\ni.e. solutions behaving at large time as the sum of infinitely many solitons.\nWe also show that one can attach a kink at one end of the train. Our proofs\nproceed by fixed point arguments around the desired profile. We present two\napproaches leading to different results, one based on a combination of\ndispersive estimates and Strichartz estimates, the other based only on\nStrichartz estimates.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score0.956

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.090 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it