MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3103728101 · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2020.3033928

Area-Efficient Nano-AES Implementation for Internet-of-Things Devices

2020· article· en· W3103728101 on OpenAlexafffund
Karim Shahbazi, Seok‐Bum Ko

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptographic Implementations and Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsDatapathComputer scienceEncryptionAdvanced Encryption StandardByteCryptosystemCryptographyApplication-specific integrated circuitEmbedded systemField-programmable gate arrayShift registerComputer hardwareComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the fast-growing number of connected tiny devices to the Internet of Things (IoT), providing end-to-end security is vital. Therefore, it is essential to design the cryptosystem based on the requirement of resource-constrained IoT devices. This article presents a lightweight advanced encryption standard (AES), a high-secure symmetric cryptography algorithm, implementation on field-programmable gate array (FPGA) and 65-nm technology for resource-constrained IoT devices. The proposed architecture includes 8-bit datapath and five main blocks. We design two specified register banks, Key-Register and State-Register, for storing the plain text, keys, and intermediate data. To reduce the area, Shift-Rows is embedded inside the State-Register. To adapt the Mix-Column to 8-bit datapath, we design an optimized 8-bit block for Mix-Columns with four internal registers, which accept 8-bit and send back 8-bit. Also, a shared optimized Sub-Bytes is employed for the key expansion phase and encryption phase. To optimize Sub-Bytes, we merge and simplify some parts of the Sub-Bytes. To reduce power consumption, we apply the clock gating technique to the design. Application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) implementation results show a respective improvement in the area over the previous similar works from 35% to 2.4%. Based on the results, the proposed design is a suitable cryptosystem for tiny IoT devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) SystemsSame topicCryptographic Implementations and SecurityFrench-language works237,207