MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3103772229 · doi:10.11159/ffhmt20.111

Thermal Simulation of Big Area Additive Manufacturing

2020· article· en· W3103772229 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSlumpingAcrylonitrile butadiene styreneThermalLayer (electronics)ImplosionPyramid (geometry)Materials scienceHeat transferMechanical engineeringOpticsEngineeringMechanicsGeologyMeteorologyComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A common failure mode of Big Area Additive Manufacturing (BAAM) is the phenomena of slumping. Slumping occurs when the structure retains excessive heat, often seen when there is insufficient cooling between layers. This study developed a transient thermal simulation model to aid in predicting the slumping phenomena, specifically in overhanging features. The simulation was modeled in ANSYS where the walls were created to match the dimensions in the experimental pyramid at 12.5 mm wide with a thickness of 5 mm. The structures overall size was 1.06 m by 0.77 m and 25 layers tall. Each layer was created independently to allow for element birth/death commands and for individual layer mesh parameters. Using the built-in element birth/death commands each layer would be inserted on top of the previous layer. As each new layer is activated a temperature input of 202C is applied then subsequently turned off as the next layer is activated. The printing material, ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene), properties and heat transfer coefficient of the structures are functions of temperature. The simulation model is compared to an experimentally measured part. A FLIR E60 thermal imaging camera is utilized to capture the vertical thermographic profile of the build. The camera was paired with a computer running the FLIR Tools software package in order to record, save, and later analyze the thermographic history. The thermal images also captured three different vertical lines traversing all layers. Each pixel in the lines would record the corresponding temperatures of the structure. The data taken from the three lines show that the cooling present in the structure is of an exponential form. This result matches what was produced from the simulation, within 5 % error. The simulation allows for dwell times to be adjusted in the model until failure is no longer predicted. Utilizing these transient thermal modeling techniques will aid BAAM designers to identify potential slumping during the print process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it