MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Migration In Greece

2020· reference-entry· en· W3104627775 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicContemporary and Historical Greek Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationEmigrationPolitical sciencePoliticsIrregular migrationDemocracyPolitical economyPopulationImmigration policyDevelopment economicsEconomySociologyEconomicsLawEthnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Greece has been typically a southern European emigration country until the 1970s but shifted rather abruptly to becoming a host country after 1989, developing slowly and reluctantly migration, integration, and asylum policies. This chapter offers an overview of the migration policies and challenges that Greece faces in the twenty-first century and on how these have evolved in the 2000s and 2010s. The chapter starts with a short presentation of the migrant population in Greece, its composition, and its insertion in the labour market so as to give a sense of the socio-economic and demographic importance of immigration in Greek society today. It then looks at the evolution of immigration and asylum policies in relation also to the politics behind such evolutions, notably the positions of the two main parties, New Democracy and PASOK, and more recently SYRIZA, as well as the role of external pressures from fellow member states and EU institutions and the overall role of exogenous factors, such as the dramatic increase of asylum-seeking flows since 2015. The chapter concludes with some critical observations concerning the present and future of immigrants and their descendants in Greek society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it