Online Bitrate Selection for Viewport Adaptive 360-Degree Video Streaming
Bibliographic record
Abstract
360-degree video streaming provides users with immersive experience by letting users determine their field-of-views (FoVs) in real time. To efficiently utilize the limited bandwidth resources, recent works have proposed a viewport adaptive 360-degree video streaming model by exploiting the bitrate adaptation in spatial and temporal domains. In this paper, under this video streaming model, we propose an online bitrate selection algorithm to enhance the user’s quality of experience (QoE). This is achieved by characterizing the user’s personalized FoV and real-time downloading capacity in an online fashion. We address the unknown user-specific FoV by introducing the reference FoV and design an online bitrate selection algorithm to learn the difference between the user’s actual FoV and the reference FoV. We prove that as the number of video segments increases, the performance of the proposed online algorithm approaches the optimal performance asymptotically, with a bounded error. We perform trace-driven simulations with real-world datasets. Simulation results show that under the scenario where the available video bitrates are relatively high, our proposed algorithm can improve the user’s viewing quality level between$4.2\!-\!29.4$percent and reduce the average intra-segment quality switch by at least 12.4 percent when compared with several existing methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".