MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3105229877 · doi:10.11159/iccste20.269

Railway Tracks Detection of Railways Based On Computer VisionTechnique and GNSS Data

2020· article· en· W3105229877 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle License Plate Recognition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGNSS applicationsComputer scienceRemote sensingComputer visionGlobal Positioning SystemTelecommunicationsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Railway networks are major components of any country's infrastructure. In Egypt, the length of the railway network is 9570 km, where, 85% of the lines' movements are operated by mechanical signals. In July 2017, the Egyptian government launched a series of railway infrastructure projects aimed to modernize the Egyptian National Railways which includes the infrastructures rehabilitation for the network. This research focuses on developing an efficient low-cost framework using video camera and computer vision techniques for automatic railway track detection. A computer vision technique is used for automatic detection of railway tracks. Interior orientation parameters are extracted as part of the camera calibration task. Bundle adjustment calibration technique is used to compute the exterior orientation parameters based on selected ground control points. Hence, the eye fish effect of the images is removed and orthogonal images for the railway tracks are constructed using matching and feature extraction algorithms. The framework is tested on a dataset of a railway network with an approximate length of 20 km. The accuracy of the results is compared with a field survey data conducted to the same area using conventional surveying instruments such as Total station and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). The proposed framework enables automatic extraction of railway tracks and its relationship with surrounding features, which contributes to quality control and assurance procedures for field collected data. The framework also offers a method for continuous and low-cost monitoring of the railway network. This will help to rapidly assess maintenance requirements for the network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it