Deep Reinforcement Learning for Demand Response in Distribution Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Load aggregators can use demand response programs to motivate residential users toward reducing electricity demand during peak time periods. This article proposes a demand response algorithm for residential users, while accounting for uncertainties in the load demand and electricity price, users' privacy concerns, and power flow constraints imposed by the distribution network. To address the uncertainty issues, we develop a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithm using an actor-critic method. We apply federated learning to enable users to determine the neural network parameters in a decentralized fashion without sharing private information (e.g., load demand, users' potential discomfort due to load scheduling). To tackle the nonconvex power flow constraints, we apply convex relaxation and transform the problem of updating the neural network parameters into a sequence of semidefinite programs (SDPs). Simulations on an IEEE 33-bus test feeder with 32 households show that the proposed demand response algorithm can reduce the peak load by 33% and the expected cost of each user by 13%. Also, we demonstrate the scalability of the proposed algorithm in 330-bus and 1650-bus feeders with real-time pricing scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".