Persistence of the Steady Normal Shock Structure for the Unsteady Potential Flow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper is devoted to the study of the stability of the steady normal shock structure in potential flows under an unsteady perturbation. The dynamic stability problem is formulated as the well-posedness problem of an initial boundary value problem of a nonlinear wave equation in a cornered space domain with a free boundary. The corner singularity is the essential difficulty and there is no result available even for the linear problem without the symmetry assumptions, i.e., “even” or “odd” traces vanish on the solid boundary, which allows extension from the cornered space domain to the half-space domain, as in the previous works. In this paper, we first obtain an existence result for the initial boundary value problem of linear hyperbolic equations of second order in a cornered space domain without such symmetry assumptions. The key idea is based on the construction of a new auxilliary problem, which allows us to reduce the linear problem to a new one that can be even extended to a half-space domain such that the existence of $H_\eta^2$-solutions can be established. However, due to the lack of the symmetry assumptions, the low regularity of the extended coefficients block us from obtaining the higher regularity of the solutions in the extended domain, which is necessary for the iteration to the nonlinear problem. In order to deal with it, new hyperbolic type and elliptic type estimates in the cornered space domain are established carefully. The results on the general linear problems can be applied to the linearized problem that we are concerned with in this paper. Due to the loss of regularity in the estimates of the linearized problem, a modified Nash--Moser iteration is developed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".