MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3107655179 · doi:10.1002/rnc.5335

Tracking control of single‐link flexible‐joint manipulator with unmodeled dynamics and dead zone

2020· article· en· W3107655179 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersHigher Education Discipline Innovation ProjectNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Tracking (education)Link (geometry)Dead zoneComputer scienceDynamics (music)Robust controlJoint (building)Stability (learning theory)Process (computing)Manipulator (device)Process dynamicsControl (management)Control engineeringEngineeringControl systemRobotArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article presents a tracking control approach for a flexible‐joint manipulator (FJM) with single link. This approach can achieve the tracking control objective and reject the influences caused by unmodeled dynamics and dead zone. The main contributions are: (1) a robust tracking control approach for the FJM with single link based on equivalent‐input‐disturbance (EID) method is proposed; (2) the unmodeled dynamics and dead zone are considered simultaneously in the tracking control of the FJM with single link; (3) in the control process, velocity measurements are not required in our approach. The robust stability of the EID‐based approach is proved, and the validity for the FJM with single link is illustrated by simulation results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score0.547

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it