Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The discourse of global aviation, particularly the communicative processes at work between airline pilots and air traffic controllers (ATCs) is markedly different from other registers of professional spoken language. Despite its complexity, pilots and ATCs are typically able to manage to move heavy pieces of machinery all over the world to permit global travel, troubleshoot emergency situations, and avoid accidents. Aeronautical radiotelephony is used by pilots and ATCs to exchange relevant information during the course of a complete flight. The International Civil Aviation Organization has provided phraseology to be used in conjunction with plain operational language to standardize and manage these aeronautical communications. Investigating the function of questions in pilot–ATC communication, S. W. Hinrich compiled a corpus of 24.5 hours of air traffic communications at the Toronto and Dublin airports. The aim of this dissertation was to examine how questions are used by ATC and pilots to repair and find or clarify miscommunications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it