MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3108935532 · doi:10.1093/geroni/igaa050

Association between physical performance and cognitive function in older adults across multiple studies: A pooled analysis study

2020· article· en· W3108935532 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInnovation in Aging · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on Aging
KeywordsDigit symbol substitution testMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCognitionOverweightMedicinePhysical therapyGerontologyGrip strengthEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performancePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychologyBody mass indexCognitive impairmentInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background and Objectives While several studies have examined the association between cognitive and physical function, the consistency of these associations across functional contexts is unclear. The consistency of association between cognitive and physical function performance was examined at baseline across 17 clinical studies with diverse and heterogeneous conditions such as overweight/obese, sedentary, at risk for a mobility disability, osteoarthritis, low vitamin D, or had signs of cognitive impairment. Research Design and Methods Data are from 1,388 adults 50 years and older who completed a cognitive and physical function assessment as part of a research study at the Wake Forest Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center or the Wake Forest Older Americans Independence Center. Linear regression models were used to relate cognitive measures [Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and the Digit Symbol Substitution Task (DSST)], and physical measures [the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and hand grip strength] for the whole sample and treat each study as a fixed effect. All models controlled for age, sex, race, and body mass index (BMI). Results Overall, there was a significant association between higher scores on the MMSE (per standard deviation) and better physical function performance (SPPB score b= 0.24, p <0.001) and its components (gait speed, chair rise, and standing balance; p’s <0.05). Higher scores on the MoCA produced similar results (SPPB score b= 0.31, p= <0.001) and higher scores on the DSST were also significantly associated with a better SPPB score (b= 0.75, p <0.001). The relationship between DSST and physical function performance demonstrated a stronger magnitude of association compared to the MMSE or MoCA. Discussion and Implications Older adults with heterogenous health conditions showed a consistent pattern between better cognitive function and better physical function performance with the strongest association among DSST scores.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it