MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3109171209 · doi:10.1002/aws2.1202

An automated and high‐throughput method for adenosine triphosphate quantification

2020· article· en· W3109171209 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAWWA Water Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiosensors and Analytical Detection
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAdenosine triphosphateBiomass (ecology)Water qualityEnvironmental scienceContaminationThroughputBiochemical engineeringMicroorganismComputer scienceChemistryBacteriaBiologyEcologyEngineeringBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Exposure to microbial contamination through drinking water is a major global health concern. Effective management of microbial drinking water quality requires rapid detection equipment. Currently, microbial quality is monitored using time‐consuming laboratory methods, which delay any response. This study demonstrates the development of an automated and high‐throughput method for the measurement of viable biomass in water through the quantification of cellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP). The developed method was able to efficiently and accurately quantify cellular ATP in multiple water samples simultaneously. In addition, it proved to be 5× faster and as accurate as the Standard Test Method for Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) Content of Microorganisms in Water (ASTM D4012). The developed method has the potential to represent a significant advancement for microbial monitoring and could benefit utilities interested in measuring viable biomass in water to monitor the health of biofilters and the effectiveness of disinfection strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.569
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it