MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3109772362 · doi:10.4208/aamm.oa-2019-0121

Optimization of Identifying Point Pollution Sources for the Convection-Diffusion-Reaction Equations

2020· article· en· W3109772362 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadiative Heat Transfer Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHenan UniversityHenan University of Technology
KeywordsDiffusionPollutionConvection–diffusion equationPoint (geometry)MechanicsEnvironmental scienceThermodynamicsMaterials scienceMathematicsPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we consider the optimization problem of identifying the pollution sources of convection-diffusion-reaction equations in a groundwater process. The optimization model is subject to a convection-diffusion-reaction equation with pumping point and pollution point sources. We develop a linked optimization and simulation approach combining with the Differential Evolution (DE) optimization algorithm to identify the pumping and injection rates from the data at the observation points. Numerical experiments are taken with injections of constant rates and time-dependent variable rates at source points. The problem with one pumping point and two pollution source points is also studied. Numerical results show that the proposed method is efficient. The developed optimized identification approach can be extended to high-dimensional and more complex problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it