Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transfusions are more common in premature infants with approximately 40% of low birth weight infants and up to 90% of extremely low birth weight infants requiring red blood cell transfusion. Although red blood cell transfusion can be life-saving in these preterm infants, it has been associated with higher rates of complications including necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity and possibly abnormal neurodevelopment. The main objective of this review is to assess current red blood cell transfusion practices in the neonatal intensive care unit, to summarize available neonatal transfusion guidelines published in different countries and to emphasize the wide variation in transfusion thresholds that exists for red blood cell transfusion. This review also addresses certain issues specific to red blood cell processing for the neonatal population including storage time, irradiation, cytomegalovirus (CMV) prevention strategies and patient blood management. Future research avenues are proposed to better define optimal transfusion practice in neonatal intensive care units.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it