Online Altitude Control and Scheduling Policy for Minimizing AoI in UAV-assisted IoT Wireless Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article considers unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) assisted Internet of Things (IoT) networks, where low resource IoT devices periodically sample a stochastic process and need to upload more recent information to a Base Station (BS). Among the myriad of applications, there is a need for timely delivery of data (for example, status-updates) before the data becomes outdated and loses its value. Since transmission capabilities of IoT devices are limited, it may not always be feasible to transmit over one hop transmission to the BS. To address this challenge, UAVs with virtual queues are deployed as middle layer between IoT devices and the BS to relay recent information over unreliable channels. In the absence of channel conditions, the optimal online scheduling policy is investigated as well as dynamic UAV altitude control that maintains a fresh status of information at the BS. The objective of this paper is to minimize the Expected Weighted Sum Age of Information (EWSA) for IoT devices. First, the problem is formulated as an optimization problem that is however generally hard to solve. Second, an online model free Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) is proposed, where the deployed UAV obtains instantaneous channel state information (CSI) in real time along with any adjustment to its deployment altitude. Third, we formulate the online problem as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm, which is a highly stable state-of-the-art DRL algorithm, is leveraged to solve the formulated problem. Finally, extensive simulations are conducted to verify findings and comprehensive comparisons with other baseline approaches are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".