MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111669244 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2020.3044800

Wearable IMU-Based System for Real-Time Monitoring of Lower-Limb Joints

2020· article· en· W3111669244 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsGyroscopeWearable computerInertial measurement unitAccelerometerComputer scienceAccelerationJoint (building)SimulationGait analysisReal-time computingGaitArtificial intelligenceEngineeringEmbedded systemPhysical medicine and rehabilitationAerospace engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent advances in micro-electromechanical systems technology have enabled the evolution of miniature, low-power, and high-performance inertial motion sensors that are commonly found in most present-day smart gadgets. Furthermore, high-speed and power-efficient communication and computing technologies may enable these sensors to potentially pave the way for home-based remote monitoring and assessment of human health in the imminent age of new technologies such as Smart Home, internet-of-things, and internet-of-everything. Continuous monitoring of lower-limb joints in a wearable platform is such an application that may potentially enable the tele-rehabilitation of patients with motor impairment, gait abnormalities, and joint injuries through quantitative rather than observational analysis of gait health. In this work, we designed, implemented, and validated a two-stage sensor fusion algorithm to estimate lower-limb joint angles in real-time. The drift in the cumulatively integrated gyroscope data was estimated in real-time using a gradient descent approach that was subsequently used to correct the inclination of the sensors. The roll and pitch angles thus obtained for each sensor mounted above and below the joint were then fused in the second stage to obtain a real-time estimate of joint angle by exploiting a gradient descent method. Since the joint angles were estimated primarily from the gyroscope data and without incorporating any magnetic field measurement, the joint angles thus obtained were least affected by the external acceleration and are insensitive to magnetic disturbances. The performance of the proposed algorithm was validated with a publicly available dataset and in the presence of simulated external acceleration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it