MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111760488 · doi:10.1109/smc42975.2020.9283109

Slip Ratio Optimization in Vehicle Safety Control Systems Using Least-Squares Based Adaptive Extremum Seeking

2020· article· en· W3111760488 on OpenAlexaff
Nursefa Zengin, Halit Zengin, Barış Fi̇dan, Amir Khajepour

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtremum Seeking Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarSimSlip ratioControl theory (sociology)AccelerationTraction control systemAnti-lock braking systemMATLABSlip (aerodynamics)Recursive least squares filterVehicle dynamicsComputer scienceEngineeringAutomotive engineeringControl (management)AlgorithmPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tire-road friction coefficient is an essential parameter in vehicle safety control systems. In particular, friction information is required by antilock braking systems (ABS) during deceleration and by traction control systems (TCS) during acceleration. The characteristic of the force acting on the tires has an extremum, which is dependent in the road condition. This paper develops a recursive least squares (RLS) based extremum seeking algorithm that estimates the optimum slip ratio on-line to produce maximum deceleration/acceleration. Results of simulation studies in both Matlab and CarSim environments are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the developed algorithm and numerically compare with gradient based estimation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicExtremum Seeking Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207