Privacy-Preserving Similarity Search With Efficient Updates in Distributed Key-Value Stores
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Privacy-preserving similarity search plays an essential role in data analytics, especially when very large encrypted datasets are stored in the cloud. Existing mechanisms on privacy-preserving similarity search were not able to support secure updates (addition and deletion) efficiently when frequent updates are needed. In this article, we propose a new mechanism to support parallel privacypreserving similarity search in a distributed key-value store in the cloud, with a focus on efficient addition and deletion operations, both executed with sublinear time complexity. If search accuracy is the top priority, we further leverage Yao's garbled circuits and the homomorphic property of Hash-ElGamal encryption to build a secure evaluation protocol, which can obtain the top-R most accurate results without extensive client-side post-processing. We have formally analyzed the security strength of our proposed approach, and performed an extensive array of experiments to show its superior performance as compared to existing mechanisms in the literature. In particular, we evaluate the performance of our proposed protocol with respect to the time it takes to build the index and perform similarity queries. Extensive experimental results demonstrated that our protocol can speedup the index building process by up to 800x with 2 threads and the similarity queries by up to -7x with comparable accuracy, as compared to the state-of-the-art in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".