MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3113501994 · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2022.103415

A non-alternating graph hashing algorithm for large-scale image search

2022· article· en· W3113501994 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Vision and Image Understanding · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Canadian institutionsActuaUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHash functionComputer scienceComputational complexity theoryLocality-sensitive hashingBinary codeAlgorithmBinary numberRelaxation (psychology)Coordinate descentMathematical optimizationTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsHash table

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the era of big data, methods for improving memory and computational efficiency have become crucial for the successful deployment of technology. Hashing is one of the most effective approaches to deal with the computational limitations associated with big data. One natural way to formulate this problem is spectral hashing, which directly incorporates an affinity to learning binary codes. However, owing to the binary constraints, the optimization becomes intractable. To mitigate this challenge, different relaxation approaches have been proposed to reduce the computational load required to obtain binary codes and still attain a good solution. The problem with all existing relaxation methods involves the use of one or more additional auxiliary variables to attain high-quality binary codes while relaxing the problem. The existence of auxiliary variables leads to the coordinate descent approach, which increases the computational complexity. We argue that the introduction of these variables is unnecessary. To this end, we propose a novel relaxed formulation for spectral hashing that adds no additional variables to the problem. Furthermore, instead of solving the problem in the original space where the number of variables is equal to the data points, we solve the problem in a much smaller space and retrieve the binary codes from this solution. This technique reduces both the memory and computational complexity simultaneously. We apply two optimization techniques, namely, the projected gradient and optimization on the manifold, to obtain the solution. Using comprehensive experiments on four public datasets, we show that the proposed efficient spectral hashing (ESH) algorithm achieves a highly competitive retrieval performance compared with the state-of-the-art algorithms at low complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it