MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3114265306 · doi:10.1201/b13135-9

Social Vulnerability, Frailty and Mortality in Elderly People

2012· book-chapter· en· W3114265306 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueApple Academic Press eBooks · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchKillam TrustsDalhousie UniversityDalhousie Medical Research Foundation
KeywordsVulnerability (computing)Social vulnerabilityGerontologyMedicineComputer scienceComputer securityPsychiatryPsychological intervention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Social vulnerability is related to the health of elderly people, but its measurement and relationship to frailty are controversial.The aims of the present study were to operationalize social vulnerability according to a deficit accumulation approach, to compare social vulnerability and frailty, and to study social vulnerability in relation to mortality.Methods and Findings: This is a secondary analysis of community-dwelling elderly people in two cohort studies, the Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA, 1996/7-2001/2; N = 3707) and the National Population Health Survey (NPHS, 1994(NPHS, -2002;; N = 2648).Social vulnerability index measures that used self-reported items (23 in NPHS, 40 in CSHA) were constructed.Each measure ranges from 0 (no vulnerability) to 1 (maximum vulnerability).The primary outcome measure was mortality over five (CHSA) or eight (NPHS) years.Associations with age, sex, and frailty (as measured by an analogously constructed frailty index) were also studied.All individuals had some degree of social vulnerability.Women had higher social vulnerability than men, and vulnerability increased with age.Frailty and social vulnerability were moderately correlated.Adjusting for age, sex, and frailty, each additional social 'deficit' was associated with an increased odds of mortality (5 years in CSHA, odds ratio = 1.05, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.07;8 years in the NPHS, odds ratio = 1.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.14).We identified a meaningful survival gradient across quartiles of social vulnerability, and although women had better survival than men, survival for women with high social vulnerability was equivalent to that of men with low vulnerability.Conclusions: Social vulnerability is reproducibly related to individual frailty/fitness, but distinct from it.Greater social vulnerability is associated with mortality in older adults.Further study on the measurement and operationalization of social vulnerability, and of its relationships to other important health outcomes, is warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it