MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3116598312 · doi:10.1109/tro.2020.3043723

A Backdrivable Kinematically Redundant (6+3)-Degree-of-Freedom Hybrid Parallel Robot for Intuitive Sensorless Physical Human–Robot Interaction

2020· article· en· W3116598312 on OpenAlexafffund
Kefei Wen, Tan-Sy Nguyen, David Harton, Thierry Laliberté, Clément Gosselin

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Robotics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsRobotParallel manipulatorHuman–robot interactionKinematicsComputer scienceRobot kinematicsRedundancy (engineering)Control theory (sociology)Degree (music)Robot manipulatorControl engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMobile robotControl (management)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel backdrivable 3-[R(RR-RRR)SR] kinematically redundant (6+3)-degree-of-freedom (DOF) spatial hybrid parallel robot with revolute actuators is proposed for low-impedance physical human–robot interaction. The kinematic model is developed based on the constraint conditions of the robot. It is shown that the type II (parallel) singularities can be completely avoided, thereby yielding a very large translational and orientational workspace. A workspace analysis is presented in order to demonstrate the capabilities of the robot. Mechanisms are then introduced to use the redundant DOF of the robot to operate a gripper with the robot actuators, which are mounted on or close to the base, thus reducing the inertia of the moving parts. The architecture of the robot makes it possible to use direct drive motors, thereby making the robot easily backdrivable and allowing the use of a very simple and effective controller. A prototype of the robot is then designed and built and the large workspace of the robot as well as the effortless physical human–robot interaction are demonstrated. The controller of the robot is then described, including a position control mode and a control mode for physical interaction, which does not require the use of a force/torque sensor or joint torque sensors. Because of its backdrivability and low moving inertia, the robot is particularly well-suited for physical human–robot interaction, as demonstrated in the accompanying videos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations99
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on RoboticsSame topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207