Stabilizing Training of Generative Adversarial Nets via Langevin Stein Variational Gradient Descent
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Generative adversarial networks (GANs), which are famous for the capability of learning complex underlying data distribution, are, however, known to be tricky in the training process, which would probably result in mode collapse or performance deterioration. Current approaches of dealing with GANs' issues almost utilize some practical training techniques for the purpose of regularization, which, on the other hand, undermines the convergence and theoretical soundness of GAN. In this article, we propose to stabilize GAN training via a novel particle-based variational inference-Langevin Stein variational gradient descent (LSVGD), which not only inherits the flexibility and efficiency of original SVGD but also aims to address its instability issues by incorporating an extra disturbance into the update dynamics. We further demonstrate that, by properly adjusting the noise variance, LSVGD simulates a Langevin process whose stationary distribution is exactly the target distribution. We also show that LSVGD dynamics has an implicit regularization, which is able to enhance particles' spread-out and diversity. Finally, we present an efficient way of applying particle-based variational inference on a general GAN training procedure no matter what loss function is adopted. Experimental results on one synthetic data set and three popular benchmark data sets-Cifar-10, Tiny-ImageNet, and CelebA-validate that LSVGD can remarkably improve the performance and stability of various GAN models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".