MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3117570688 · doi:10.1109/ojcas.2020.3047418

Hardware-Aware Design for Edge Intelligence

2020· article· en· W3117570688 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of Circuits and Systems · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSoftware deploymentEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionInferenceEdge deviceCloud computingLatency (audio)Edge computingDeep neural networksServerBandwidth (computing)Distributed computingComputer architectureComputer networkArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkTelecommunicationsSoftware engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the rapid growth of the number of devices connected to the Internet, there is a trend to move intelligent processing of the generated data with deep neural networks (DNNs) from cloud servers to the network edge. Performing inference and training of DNNs in edge hardware is motivated by latency constraints, security and privacy concerns, and restricted network bandwidth. However, implementation of DNNs is challenging in resource-constrained edge devices. This article surveys recent advances in the efficient processing of DNNs, highlighting present research trends and future challenges. Specifically, we start by reviewing optimization methods for hardware-aware deployment of DNNs. We then present some case studies of promising new directions towards low-complexity on-chip training. Finally, we discuss future challenges and their potential solutions for efficient deployment of DNNs at the edge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.156
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it