Effectiveness of peer‐supervision on pediatric fever illness treatment among registered private drug sellers in <scp>East‐Central</scp> Uganda: An interrupted time series analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Rationale, aims, and objectives Appropriate treatment of pediatric fever in rural areas remains a challenge and maybe partly due to inadequate supervision of licensed drug sellers. This study assessed the effectiveness of peer‐supervision among drug sellers on the appropriate treatment of pneumonia symptoms, uncomplicated malaria, and non‐bloody diarrhea among children less than 5 years of age in the intervention (Luuka) and comparison (Buyende) districts, in East‐Central Uganda. Methods Data on pneumonia symptoms, uncomplicated malaria, and non‐bloody diarrhea among children less than 5 years of age was abstracted from drug shop sick child registers over a 12‐month period; 6 months before and 6 months after the introduction of peer‐supervision. Interrupted time series were applied to determine the effectiveness of the peer‐supervision intervention on the appropriate treatment of pneumonia, uncomplicated malaria, and non‐bloody diarrhea among children less than 5 years of age attending drug shops in East Central Uganda. Results The proportion of children treated appropriately for pneumonia symptoms was 10.84% (P < .05, CI = [1.75, 19.9]) higher, for uncomplicated malaria was 1.46% (P = .79, CI = [−10.43, 13.36]) higher, and for non‐bloody diarrhea was 4.00% (P < .05, CI = [−7.95, −0.13]) lower in the intervention district than the comparison district, respectively. Post‐intervention trend results showed an increase of 1.21% (P = .008, CI = [0.36, 2.05]) in the proportion appropriately treated for pneumonia symptoms, no difference in appropriate treatment for uncomplicated malaria, and a reduction of 1% (P < .06, CI = [−1.95, 0.02]) in the proportion of children appropriately treated for non‐bloody diarrhea, respectively. Conclusions Peer‐supervision increased the proportion of children less than 5 years of age that received appropriate treatment for pneumonia symptoms but not for uncomplicated malaria and non‐bloody diarrhea. Implementation of community‐level interventions to improve pediatric fever management should consider including peer‐supervision among drug sellers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.032 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".