MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3118969680 · doi:10.1016/j.envadv.2021.100035

Lepidolite extraction solid by-product: Mitigation of thallium leaching and utilization of radiogenic strontium isotopes as a tracer

2021· article· en· W3118969680 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Advances · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicThallium and Germanium Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLeachateLeaching (pedology)Environmental chemistryAmendmentChemistryTopsoilResidue (chemistry)PhosphogypsumEnvironmental scienceSoil waterSoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emerging growth of lithium-ion battery usage necessitates the development of unconventional resources for battery grade lithium carbonate. Extraction of lithium from micas such as lepidolite produces several marketable by-products as well as a silt-sized gypsum rich blended residue containing elevated level of thallium (Tl). The goal of this study was to assess the alternative use of the blended residue as fill material for mine reclamation. Bulk elemental analysis and shake flask extraction of the blended residue showed that radionuclide and heavy metal levels of the solid blended residue and its leachate were within the guidelines for soil and its leachates. However, Tl concentration (24.7 ± 0.9 mg/kg), possibly in the forms of water-soluble salts in the blended residue, was much higher than the general level of Tl in naturally uncontaminated soil (<1 mg/kg). Thus, the efficiency of four easily accessible amendments (peat, clay, biochar, and topsoil) in mitigating the release of Tl was evaluated using a modified SPLP procedure. In addition, the usefulness of radiogenic Sr isotopes (87Sr/86Sr) as a tracer of the leachate plumes derived from the blended residue was assessed. Results from SPLP experiments showed that Tl was released from the blended residue under a wide range of pH values, especially under acidic conditions. Mixing proportions of the blended residue and amendment (1:9 or 1:1) did not appreciably affect the high Tl removal efficiencies (68 – 89%) of clay, biochar, and topsoil. While mixing time did not affect the Tl removal efficiencies of clay and topsoil, Tl removal efficiency of biochar proportionally increased with mixing time and was at the highest value (~95%) among four amendments, if the mixing time was at least 7 days. Peat was not an effective amendment because its acidity possibly enhanced the release of Tl. The 87Sr/86Sr ratios in leachates of the blended residue (0.792 – 0.810) and its amendment mixtures were significantly higher than those in surface and groundwaters, soil leachates, and coal mine drainage. Thus, when the blended residue is used as fill material for mine reclamation, 87Sr/86Sr can be a powerful naturally occurring tracer in distinguishing Tl from the blended residue from other major sources of Tl in the environment. Overall, this study recommends clay and soils as the most promising amendments in mitigating the release of Tl in well-drained systems, and biochar for poor drainage conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.642

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it