Delay-Sensitive Multi-Source Multicast Resource Optimization in NFV-Enabled Networks: A Column Generation Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Telecommunication networks are currently realizing more-huge-than-ever data demands from subscribers all over the world. Due to the ongoing pandemic, nearly all businesses have adapted working models with remote operations. People engaged with major industries, e.g., academia, health and municipalities are utilizing online platforms to carryout their routine tasks. This indeed shifts the attention from one-to-one (unicast) communication to one-to-many (multicast) and many-to-many (multi-source multi-destination) communications. Network operators are facing increased pressure to provide quick responses in order to satisfy the bandwidth hungry and time sensitive user demands. This can only be done by enhancing deployability as well as manageability of the services. Network Function Virtualization (NFV) provides a transformation of traditional proprietary network designs to a more agile and software based environment in order to achieve flexible deployments, reduced setup costs and less-time-to-market for the new services which is very much needed in the current scenarios. Previous studies on NFV-enabled multicast problem either proposed Integer Linear Program (ILP) models, that are pretty unscalable, or heuristic-based techniques that do not guarantee good quality of the solutions obtained. In this article, we propose an NFV multicast resource optimization model exploiting the use of multiple sources and considering the end-to-end delay and bandwidth requirements. Herein, we propose a novel Dantzig-Wolfe (DW) decomposition model that tackles the complexity of the problem by breaking it down into a master problem and several pricing problems. We compare the DW approach with the ILP and heuristic methods and demonstrate that our approach achieves near to optimal solution (in comparison to heuristic based methods) much faster than ILP. We also study the dynamic admission of NFV-enabled multicast requests by solving the problem in an online manner using the batch processing of requests. We then evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithms through extensive simulations and demonstrate that proposed algorithms are promising and outperform existing solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".