MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Retrospective motion artifact correction of structural MRI images using deep learning improves the quality of cortical surface reconstructions

2021· article· en· W3119151570 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringNational Institute on AgingCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchJanssen Research and DevelopmentNational Institutes of HealthGenentechIXICOH. Lundbeck A/SServierGE HealthcareFujirebio USRocheUniversity of Southern CaliforniaU.S. Department of DefenseAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeBrightFocus FoundationPfizerMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's ResearchNorthern California Institute for Research and EducationJohnson and JohnsonAbbVieMerck
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceArtifact (error)Image qualityConvolutional neural networkNeuroimagingComputer visionMotion (physics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)NeurosciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Head motion during MRI acquisition presents significant challenges for neuroimaging analyses. In this work, we present a retrospective motion correction framework built on a Fourier domain motion simulation model combined with established 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures. Quantitative evaluation metrics were used to validate the method on three separate multi-site datasets. The 3D CNN was trained using motion-free images that were corrupted using simulated artifacts. CNN based correction successfully diminished the severity of artifacts on real motion affected data on a separate test dataset as measured by significant improvements in image quality metrics compared to a minimal motion reference image. On the test set of 13 image pairs, the mean peak signal-to-noise-ratio was improved from 31.7 to 33.3 dB. Furthermore, improvements in cortical surface reconstruction quality were demonstrated using a blinded manual quality assessment on the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) dataset. Upon applying the correction algorithm, out of a total of 617 images, the number of quality control failures was reduced from 61 to 38. On this same dataset, we investigated whether motion correction resulted in a more statistically significant relationship between cortical thickness and Parkinson's disease. Before correction, significant cortical thinning was found to be restricted to limited regions within the temporal and frontal lobes. After correction, there was found to be more widespread and significant cortical thinning bilaterally across the temporal lobes and frontal cortex. Our results highlight the utility of image domain motion correction for use in studies with a high prevalence of motion artifacts, such as studies of movement disorders as well as infant and pediatric subjects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.518
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it