MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3120080580 · doi:10.3808/jeil.202000040

Computational Analytics for Supporting Environmental Decision-Making and Analysis: An Introduction

2020· article· en· W3120080580 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Informatics Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScope (computer science)Data scienceAnalyticsInformaticsRelevance (law)Management scienceVisual analyticsDecision support systemVisualizationArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In practice, environmental informatics involves a combination of computers, computation, mathematical modelling, and system science to address real-world environmental problems. This special issue includes a number of applied computational analytics papers that either create new methods or provide innovative applications of existing methods for assisting with environmental decision-making applications using informatics. In line with the aims and scope of the special issue, the diversity of applications in the papers highlights a wide spectrum of both practical relevance and methodological contributions to research in environmental decision-making and analysis. The contributions contained in this issue all demonstrate novel approaches of computational analytics as applied to environmental decision-makingbe this on the side of modelling, computational solution procedures, visual analytics, and/or technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.634

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it