MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3120232240 · doi:10.1109/jstars.2020.3044424

Foreword to the Special Issue on Digital Innovations in Agriculture Research and Applications

2020· article· en· W3120232240 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDigitalization and Economic Development in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaIstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiGeorge Mason University
KeywordsComputer scienceAgricultureData scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The articles in this special section focus on the use of digital technology in agricultural research and applications. Sustainability of global agricultural and food systems is one of the prominent factors for peaceful future of the world in next few decades. Although agriculture is the main part of the global food supply chain, it is under rising pressure of global climate change, environmental deterioration, and falling per-capita arable land. Efficiency and sustainability management at all levels of agricultural planning and production appear as the most promising balancing factor for the short and medium terms. For this reason, timely and accurate information about the current conditions and future predictions in agriculture and the related resources become more important than ever. We are living in an age that the annual production number of transistors in microprocessors is more than the number of wheat grains produced in the same year. This is an indication of increasing data processing capability and decreasing cost. On the other hand, the number of Internet connected devices is estimated to be more than 20 billion now and is increasing rapidly, and Intent-of-Things (IoT) devices have the highest share in this rising trend. While it may be not able to solve long-term global food sustainability issue, the rapid increase in data collection and processing capabilities for agricultural monitoring and prediction may remediate the issue at least in short and middle terms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1180.082

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote SensingSame topicDigitalization and Economic Development in AgricultureFrench-language works237,207