MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3120447091 · doi:10.1109/ojcas.2020.3040947

A Study of Discrete Multitone Modulation for Wireline Links Beyond 100 Gb/s

2021· article· en· W3120447091 on OpenAlexafffund
Behraz Vatankhahghadim, Nijwm Wary, James Bailey, Anthony Chan Carusone

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of Circuits and Systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)University of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWirelineBit error rateModulation (music)Digital subscriber lineComputer scienceElectronic engineeringChannel (broadcasting)JitterBasebandEqualization (audio)Pulse-amplitude modulationTopology (electrical circuits)Electrical engineeringTelecommunicationsPhysicsWirelessEngineeringPulse (music)Bandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To overcome the severe losses beyond 28 GHz in low-cost electrical channels, 4-level pulse-amplitude modulation (4-PAM) wireline links targeting 112 Gb/s incorporate resourceor power-intensive equalization schemes such as decision-feedback equalizers (DFE) with many taps. Alleviating the timing constraints that cause DFEs to balloon in size and power, discrete multitone (DMT) modulation involves independent sub-channels that can be equalized in the frequency domain without feedback. DMT allows flexibility in assigning bits to each sub-channel, thereby potentially avoiding lossy parts of the frequency spectrum. This article presents behavioural modeling results and an experimental setup used to study DMT transceivers. Our simulations show 200 Gb/s operation at a bit error rate (BER) of less than 10-5over an IEEE P802.3ck channel with 21 dB of loss at 50 GHz and assuming 150 fsrms of jitter, 1.26 mVrms of noise at the receiver's input, and 7-bit 80 GS/s data converters. An updated bit-loading algorithm led to BER values 1-2 orders of magnitude below our previous results. The estimated power and area of the associated digital signal processing are comparable to those of DFE. We also present an experimental DMT setup achieving 61.6 Gb/s at a BER of 8.6 × 10-4over a physical channel with severe notches that is very challenging for 4-PAM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Open Journal of Circuits and SystemsSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207