MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3120561503 · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000002595

HFE Genotype and Endurance Performance in Competitive Male Athletes

2020· article· en· W3120561503 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics and Physical Performance
Canadian institutionsCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsGenotypeHemochromatosisAthletesSingle-nucleotide polymorphismVO2 maxInternal medicineEndurance trainingSNPHereditary hemochromatosisMedicinePhysiologyEndocrinologyBiologyPhysical therapyGeneticsHeart rateBlood pressureGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Hereditary hemochromatosis can cause individuals to absorb too much iron from their diet. Higher tissue iron content, below the threshold of toxicity, may enhance oxygen carrying capacity and offer a competitive advantage. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in the homeostatic iron regulator (HFE) gene have been shown to modify iron metabolism and can be used to predict an individual's risk of hemochromatosis. Several studies have shown that HFE genotypes are associated with elite endurance athlete status; however, no studies have examined whether HFE genotypes are associated with endurance performance. PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to determine whether there was an association between HFE risk genotypes (rs1800562 and rs1799945) and endurance performance in a 10-km cycling time trial as well as maximal oxygen uptake (V˙O2peak), an indicator of aerobic capacity. METHODS: Competitive male athletes (n = 100; age = 25 ± 4 yr) completed a 10-km cycling time trial. DNA was isolated from saliva and genotyped for the rs1800562 (C282Y) and rs1799945 (H63D) SNP in HFE. Athletes were classified as low risk (n = 88) or medium/high risk (n = 11) based on their HFE genotype for both SNP using an algorithm. ANCOVA was conducted to compare outcome variables between both groups. RESULTS: Individuals with the medium- or high-risk genotype were ~8% (1.3 min) faster than those with the low-risk genotype (17.0 ± 0.8 vs 18.3 ± 0.3 min, P = 0.05). V˙O2peak was ~17% (7.9 mL·kg-1⋅min-1) higher in individuals with the medium- or high-risk genotype compared with those with the low-risk genotype (54.6 ± 3.2 vs 46.7 ± 1.0 mL·kg-1⋅min-1, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Our findings show that HFE risk genotypes are associated with improved endurance performance and increased V˙O2peak in male athletes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it