DPCMNE: Detecting Protein Complexes From Protein-Protein Interaction Networks Via Multi-Level Network Embedding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biological functions of a cell are typically carried out through protein complexes. The detection of protein complexes is therefore of great significance for understanding the cellular organizations and protein functions. In the past decades, many computational methods have been proposed to detect protein complexes. However, most of the existing methods just search the local topological information to mine dense subgraphs as protein complexes, ignoring the global topological information. To tackle this issue, we propose the DPCMNE method to detect protein complexes via multi-level network embedding. It can preserve both the local and global topological information of biological networks. First, DPCMNE employs a hierarchical compressing strategy to recursively compress the input protein-protein interaction (PPI) network into multi-level smaller PPI networks. Then, a network embedding method is applied on these smaller PPI networks to learn protein embeddings of different levels of granularity. The embeddings learned from all the compressed PPI networks are concatenated to represent the final protein embeddings of the original input PPI network. Finally, a core-attachment based strategy is adopted to detect protein complexes in the weighted PPI network constructed by the pairwise similarity of protein embeddings. To assess the efficiency of our proposed method, DPCMNE is compared with other eight clustering algorithms on two yeast datasets. The experimental results show that the performance of DPCMNE outperforms those state-of-the-art complex detection methods in terms of F1 and F1+Acc. Furthermore, the results of functional enrichment analysis indicate that protein complexes detected by DPCMNE are more biologically significant in terms of P-score.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".