MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3121623877

Child Poverty, Homelessness and the Exploitation of Children

2008· book-chapter· en· W3121623877 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRUNE (Research UNE) · 2008
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPovertyPsychologyChild povertyEconomic growthEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter places in context the manner in which the law seeks to address issues of child poverty, homelessness and the exploitation of children. Child poverty is an area where politicians have set overly ambitious goals. In 1987, then Prime Minister, Bob Hawke, pledged that 'by 1990 no Australian child will be living in poverty' - a pledge he now regrets having made. The Canadian House of Commons passed a motion in 1989 which stated the goal of eliminating child poverty in Canada by 2000. In 1999, then United Kingdom Prime Minister, Tony Blair, similarly pledged to end child poverty in the annual Beveridge Lecture. While equally ambitious as his Australian counterpart, Blair's speech nevertheless set out the agenda for bringing about this reform, indicating its overlapping aspects by identifying reform of student finance, youth employment programs, welfare law reform, pension reform, child-support law reform, family and child benefit reform and long-term care and housing benefit reform as part of an integrated approach to ending child poverty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it