MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3122029909

Washington State All-Weather Road GIS Mapping: Improving Statewide Freight Flows and Connectivity

2007· preprint· en· W3122029909 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2007
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTransportation Systems and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessState (computer science)Government (linguistics)Transport engineeringDistribution (mathematics)Engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Freight transportation is extremely important in Washington as it underpins the national and state economies, supports national defense and facilitates the distribution of goods and services to nearly all state residents on a daily basis. Because of this, the freight transportation system in Washington must function at all levels of government from international, national, to state and local. Internationally, Washington is a “gateway” state connecting Asian & Canadian trade flows to the U.S. economy. Nationally, Washington's freight system facilitates trade from Alaska and along the west coast. Additionally, the state's firms and farmers use the freight transportation system to ship Washington made goods locally, across the country and around the world. And lastly, Washington's freight transportation system serves as a local utility, vital to citizens throughout the state to meet their consumption needs. As a result, the planning of freight improvement projects should be seamless across various government jurisdictions and county/state boundaries. To understand the need for the coordinated collection and presentation of data, one needs only consider the various types of roads that contribute to the freight transportation system in Washington. Not only does the state host international border crossings and interstate highways, it is comprised of a myriad of county and city roads. As a result, there are several key agencies that have a stake in freight transportation planning in Washington: Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), County Road Administration Board (CRAB), Strategic Freight Transportation Analysis (SFTA) as well as the county and municipal governments. In the process of completing this study, it was necessary to contact each of these agencies for assistance in the collection of data and maps. To assist planners and policymakers at all levels of government, this paper describes the statistical and geospatial data collected from each county in Washington State and the analytical application of a complete GIS mapping of all-weather roads throughout the state, along with future county freight improvement projects. This information is then evaluated and analyzed on a regional/statewide basis to identify gaps or system inefficiencies resulting from local/county improvement projects that don’t extend across county borders. Specific county and regional case studies/examples of how this centralized GIS may aid policy decision-maker are also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it