MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3122530800 · doi:10.14232/ejqtde.2021.1.6

Geometry and integrability of quadratic systems with invariant hyperbolas

2021· article· en· W3122530800 on OpenAlexaff
Regilene Oliveira, Dana Schlomiuk, Ana Maria Travaglini

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic journal of qualitative theory of differential equations · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperbolaMathematicsInvariant (physics)Integrable systemConic sectionQuadratic equationPure mathematicsBifurcationAlgebraic numberMathematical analysisGeometryNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let QSH be the family of non-degenerate planar quadratic differential systems possessing an invariant hyperbola. We study this class from the viewpoint of integrability. This is a rich family with a variety of integrable systems with either polynomial, rational, Darboux or more general Liouvillian first integrals as well as non-integrable systems. We are interested in studying the integrable systems in this family from the topological, dynamical and algebraic geometric viewpoints. In this work we perform this study for three of the normal forms of QSH, construct their topological bifurcation diagrams as well as the bifurcation diagrams of their configurations of invariant hyperbolas and lines and point out the relationship between them. We show that all systems in one of the three families have a rational first integral. For another one of the three families, we give a global answer to the problem of Poincaré by producing a geometric necessary and sufficient condition for a system in this family to have a rational first integral. Our analysis led us to raise some questions in the last Section, relating the geometry of the invariant algebraic curves (lines and hyperbolas) in the systems and the expression of the corresponding integrating factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronic journal of qualitative theory of differential equationsSame topicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical SystemsFrench-language works237,207