MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3122654098 · doi:10.1093/jjfinec/nbr010

Microinformation, Nonlinear Filtering, and Granularity

2011· preprint· en· W3122654098 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Financial Econometrics · 2011
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGranularityKalman filterGaussianComputationState spaceState variableFilter (signal processing)Nonlinear systemComputer scienceState (computer science)TupleMathematicsMathematical optimizationApplied mathematicsAlgorithmStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recursive prediction and filtering formulas of the Kalman filter are difficult to implement in nonlinear state space models since they require the updating of a function. The aim of this paper is to consider the situation of a large number n of individual measurements, called microinformation, and to take advantage of the large cross-sectional size to get closed-form prediction and filtering formulas at order 1/n. The state variables have a macrofactor interpretation. The results are applied to maximum likelihood estimation of a macroparameter and to computation of a granularity adjusted Value-at-Risk (VaR) for large portfolios. The granularity adjustment for VaR is illustrated by an application of the value of the firm model (Merton, 1974, Journal of Finance 29, 449–470) taking into account both default and loss given default.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.381
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it